User talk:Jaf05

RE: endangering Hampedia tenets:

This is an internet based wiki of Hampshire knowledge, and mediations should be able to be carried out in the same manner. Public outcry was more than visible on relevant talk pages, which were outright ignored by the Hampedia board in their deliberations. How can Hampedia begin to get off the ground as an online repository of cited, factual, information and knowledge if all that is online is ignored? I sent my complaint to you outlining what was wrong with the policies at hand by email as well, and from what has (not) happened - (a vote, to be carried out by the Hampedia Board of Trustees), it was completely ignored.

So, if you want to call me paranoid, go ahead, but please explain to me how covering up cited, factual information, then filibustering on a vote about the appropriate display of information is paranoid. I'm simply defending the freedom of knowledge and information on Hampedia.

Where am I not being constructive in my desire to change Hampedia for the better, and reduce content management by a board? I believe I am quite justified in my pursuits, as NPOV use of Hampedia is at current being breached, and cited, factual information is being effectively censored by the current board (I do not assume it was the board's intention).

See Talk:Sam Light for an example. (Rob 02:42, 27 November 2009 (UTC))

Thanks for helping me with my page Jose!--Ian Thanks for fixing that :) -sarah mac

I'd link Taking Root to Hampedia resources like the Guerilla Guide, and possibly cross-link and add a link to it in the GG. Also, it would be useful to add to the first year portal. ^-^ Agv07 16:00, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Spotlight
Why the revert? You didn't leave an edit summary (other than the automated rollback one, which says nothing). --Ihm08 01:55, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for your assistance.
I hope more alums discover Hampedia and chime in on some of what's been going on.